|
from Social Issues
Psychologist Says Bisexuality Opens Up
Creative New Possibilities for Sexual Expression
The American Psychological Association's Monitor on Psychology
recently published an article describing the creative possibilities of bisexual expression.
NARTH's president Joseph Nicolosi responded with the following letter (which the
Monitor chose not to publish):
To: Sara Martin, Editor
Monitor on Psychology
750 First St., NE
Washington, DC 20002-4242
Dear Ms. Martin:
In your April issue, Dr. Linda Garnets of UCLA ("Our Erotic Personalities Are Unique as our
Fingerprints,") says that limiting ourselves to heterosexuality places an unnecessary constriction
on human potential. When we overcome our fears of homosexual expression, we will discover
rich, creative possibilities.
Thus Dr. Garnets makes a statement of scientific fact (that people are capable of a wide range
of sexual responsiveness) and then slips directly into an area that is the realm of philosophy and
ethics (her judgment that sexual diversity is good). She ignores the is/ought distinction -- that "what is"
is not necessarily "what ought to be."
Science cannot, of course, tell us whether a heterosexual ethic -- or a celebration of sexual
diversity -- is right or wrong.
Still, had Dr. Garnets called instead for a monagamous, heterosexual ethic, she would have
been dismissed as a heterosexist whose opinions should be limited to Sunday sermons. But when
a psychologist's moral prescription calls for celebration of sexual
diversity, her work is uncontroversial and is assumed to be a pronouncement of
science. One cannot help but be taken by the irony.
Sincerely,
Joseph Nicolosi, Ph.D.
Updated: 8 February 2008
|
