|
from Interviews/Testimonials
Against the Current: The Cost Of Speaking Out For Orientation Change In Canada
By Dr. Chris Kempling Psy.D., R.C.C.
June 13, 2005 -- It has become increasingly difficult to speak publicly about
orientation change or make any valid criticism of homosexual behavior in Canada.
Homosexual activists have been quite successful in pressing their agenda to
normalize their lifestyle and have worked vigorously to silence opponents.
Several religious leaders have been targeted recently, including the outspoken
Roman Catholic Bishop of Calgary, Alberta, Bishop Fred Henry. He has been
called before the Alberta Human Rights Tribunal for a pastoral letter that was
read from the pulpits in his diocese. The letter basically outlined the
Catholic church's teaching on sexually immoral behavior, but it was released to
the media by an unauthorized person. Bishop Henry has also been threatened by
the Canadian tax department to refrain from speaking out on marriage or risk
losing the charitable status of his church.
There are other examples as well. The largest school district in the province
of British Columbia in the Vancouver suburb of Surrey was sued by one of its own
employees, a homosexual kindergarten teacher, so that he could use books
promoting same-sex families in his classroom. The Supreme Court of Canada
eventually ruled that the school district's decision to forbid use of the books
was influenced by the religious beliefs of some trustees and parents, and
ordered the school board to re-evaluate the books without any religious
criteria. The gay kindergarten teacher was furious when the school board
rejected the books again because two were out of print and the third had a
grammatical error in it. But two lesbian women are now suing the school board
again, because the board had allowed religious parents from Christian, Sikh and
Hindu religions to explain their concerns about the books in a public meeting,
and the lesbians didn't like their statements. That case will be before the BC
Human Rights Tribunal in August, 2005.
Another homosexual teacher has a lawsuit before the BC Human Rights Tribunal. He
is trying to force the British Columbia Ministry of Education to change the
entire British Columbia school curriculum for all grades and subject areas to
include "queer studies" and "queer role models." If he is successful, even
students in religious schools may be affected, as all private religious schools
which accept government funding must prove that they are using the BC
Curriculum.
The Persecution Continues
Then there's my case. On May 9, 2002, I was convicted of conduct unbecoming a
member of the BC College of Teachers. The reason was because I expressed my
opinion in my local newspaper. Between April 1997 and July, 2000, I wrote one
freelance column and six letters to the editor of my town's newspaper, which
questioned the wisdom of promoting the homosexual agenda. I provided factual
information on rates of promiscuity and disease infection, which had been
previously published in scholarly journals. I said that many religions consider
homosexuality to be immoral, that it may be caused by negative psycho-social
influences, and that it was nothing to be applauded. I said that I would refuse
to be a false teacher, compromising my faith to teach information which the
Bible clearly says is immoral. I said this not in my classroom, or my staff
room, but on the editorial pages of my local newspaper. I had thought that the
editorial page was a place where all Canadians have the right to express their
points of view, whether other people like them or not.
I highly value the freedom of the press, and all points of view should be
represented in our newspapers, including those opposed to ours. But, as a man by
the name of Heyward Broun once said, "Everyone favors free speech in the slack
moments when no axes are being ground." And how true that is.
I appealed the conviction to the BC Supreme Court, but lost in February of last
year. If this verdict is upheld by the courts, teachers will not be able to
write privately to their own supervisors to question a new curriculum resource,
or write privately their own elected officials on a matter of public policy, nor
will they able to address the topic of homosexuality in post-graduate research
papers. I was disciplined for doing all of these things. This is an
unacceptable restriction of freedom of speech, freedom of conscience, and
freedom of intellectual expression.
The College presented no complaints about what I had written publicly from
teachers, none from students, none from parents, and most importantly, none from
any member of the gay community. The people who did disagree with me did so by
writing their own letters to the editor, and I fully support their right to do
that.
The Catholic Civil Rights League, the Christian Legal Fellowship, the
Evangelical Fellowship of Canada, and The Christian Teachers Association have
banded together to form the Canadian Religion Freedom Alliance to assist in my
defense. My union, the BC Teachers' Federation, is also supporting me. The
case was heard on April 21-22, 2005 and the decision has been reserved at the
time of this writing. Joining the College of Teachers in opposing me was the BC
Civil Liberties Association, that feels I should be suspended indefinitely
unless I publicly recant, and the BC Public School Employers Association.
Efforts To Silence Me Continue
My school district supervisors have also decided to silence me. They have
disciplined me repeatedly for speaking out, including for advertising my
intention to offer orientation change therapy services through my private
practice. On March 31, 2005, I was required to appear before a formal hearing
of the Quesnel School Board to explain why I publicly criticized the
government's same-sex marriage legislation as a spokesperson for my political
party. They suspended me without pay for three months, even though not one
homosexual person has complained about what I wrote. The school board ignored
its own contract requirement forbidding discrimination against employees for
political affiliation or political activity. I've filed a Human Rights
complaint against the school district for religious and political
discrimination.
NARTH's Chairman of its Scientific Advisory Committee, Dr. A. Dean Byrd, is
currently considering acting as an expert witness on my behalf in the tribunal
hearing to be held on October 25, 2005 in Quesnel.
People have been quite interested in my case. On March 4, 2005, I addressed the
UN Commission on Human Rights in New York City. On June 6, 2005, I was invited
to Ottawa to speak to the House of Commons Committee investigating the impact of
the government's same-sex marriage legislation. The committee is dominated by
those in favor of the legislation, however, and the government wishes to see a
country-wide same-sex marriage bill by the early summer. But 35 of the
government's own members are opposed to the bill, and could vote to defeat the
government over the matter, forcing an early election in Canada.
There is a great deal of uncertainty and divisiveness over this issue in Canada.
Frankly, it has been a long nine year struggle for me, speaking out against the
homosexual agenda. But I continue to do so because I care deeply about the
well-being of children, and wish to ensure that they receive accurate
information about orientation, and orientation change. Furthermore, it is very
distressing to be disciplined merely for advertising the services of my private
practice and speaking out on behalf of my political party. Currently, I am
working temporarily as a dump truck driver to stay financially solvent. Those
who wish to contribute to my trust fund may do so as follows: Christian Public
School Teachers Legal Defense Fund, c/o Mr. Jim Sagert, Trustee, 798 Beaubien
Avenue, Quesnel, BC Canada, V2J 1S5.
Dr. Chris Kempling Psy.D. R.C.C. Registered Clinical Counsellor
250-983-3949 Quesnel, BC V2J 5R5 Kempling@telus.net
Updated: 2 September 2008
|