NARTH Sign up for email updates

Sign Up
     Home       Get Involved       About NARTH       Main Issues       News Watch       Announcements       Online Store       Available Resources       Donate   

from Ethical Issues

Survey Analyzes Psychologists' Attitudes On Client-Directed Treatment Goals

April 15, 2005 - Researchers Angela M. Liszcz and Mark A. Yarhouse have published results of a survey of psychologists on their attitudes about client-directed therapy.

The survey was published in a recent issue of Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training (Vol. 42, No. 1, 111-115, 2005).

Liszcz works at the Coatesville Veterans Administration Medical Center; Yarhouse is with the Regent University School of Psychology and Counseling.

The purpose of the survey was to discover the "degree of agreement with client-directed goals among three different groups of psychologists: generalists; those self-identified as specializing in lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) issues; and psychologists who were religiously affiliated."

Psychologists were selected at random from members of the Christian Association for Psychological Studies; generalists with the American Psychological Association; and APA-affiliated psychologists who specialized in gay and lesbian issues.

Each respondent was given four vignettes involving a male who had same-sex attraction. In each case, the client had a different treatment goal. The four goals were: 1. To come out of the closet; 2. To sort out his sexual identity; 3. To decrease same-sex attractions to achieve celibacy; and 4. To change his sexual orientation.

The respondents were given four options in responding to each of these vignettes. One option was to state that homosexuality is a normal variation of sexuality and the treatment goal was to affirm the behavior; the second response was neutrality with the respondent agreeing to help the individual achieve his stated goals; the third was to state that homosexuality was a developmental abnormality and the treatment goal was celibacy; and the fourth response was that homosexual was an abnormality and the treatment goal was a change in sexual orientation.

In vignette 1, only 28% of the religious psychologists endorsed a gay-affirming response, compared to 90% for generalists and 100% for LGB specialists.

In vignette 3, 62% agreed that celibacy was a legitimate goal of treatment, compared to 5% for LGB specialists and 13% for generalists. In vignette 4, 1% of LGB specialists agreed that sexual orientation change should be the goal, compared with 57% of religious psychologists and 13% of generalists.

According to the authors, "REL clinicians, LGB specialists, and GEN show significant differences in agreement with client-directed treatment goals when responding to vignettes depicting a client presenting with various concerns."




Updated: 8 February 2008

Defend the truth!  Make a difference.
 
Search
FIND A THERAPIST  click here
Join us at the next NARTH Training Institute and Convention in beautiful Denver, Colorado on November 7, 8, and 9, 2008.

Click here for a schedule of events or to register!